What is an alternative investment fund?

An Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) is a collective investment vehicle that pools capital from multiple investors to invest in assets according to a defined investment strategy. Unlike traditional investment funds, such as mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs), AIFs typically invest in non-traditional asset classes. These can include private equity, hedge funds, real estate, commodities, infrastructure, and other non-standard financial instruments.

AIFs are often characterized by their flexibility in investment strategies, which can include leveraging, short selling, and investing in derivatives. They are generally targeted at institutional investors or high-net-worth individuals due to their complex nature and higher risk profile compared to traditional investment funds.

In the European Union, AIFs are regulated under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), which sets out rules for the management, marketing, and oversight of these funds to ensure investor protection and financial stability.

How is an AIF defined?

An Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) is defined under the European Union’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) as a collective investment undertaking, including investment compartments thereof, which:

1. Raises capital from a number of investors, with a view to investing it in accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of those investors; and
2. Does not require authorization as a UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) under the UCITS Directive.

This definition is intentionally broad to encompass a wide range of investment vehicles that fall outside the scope of traditional investment funds like UCITS. AIFs can include hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate funds, infrastructure funds, and other types of funds that invest in non-traditional asset classes or employ alternative investment strategies.

The key elements of the definition are the collective investment nature, the raising of capital from multiple (more than two) investors, and the operation under a defined investment policy. AIFs are subject to specific regulatory requirements under the AIFMD, which aims to enhance investor protection and ensure the stability of the financial system.

What’s the difference between registration and authorization?

Registration is simple and inexpensive process where the manager files for registration. Hence there is little review of the applicable terms or similar and very rarely are there any delays or problems registering as an AIFM. Authorization however is a more complex and time consuming (costly) process with significantly higher fees to the regulators.

The duty to seek authorization is based on thresholds in accordance with the following:

1. AIF managers must register if the total assets under management, including those acquired through financial leverage, do not exceed 100 million euros.
2. Alternatively, if the assets do not exceed 500 million euros, registration is required provided that the portfolios consist of AIFs without financial leverage and without the right to redemption for a period of five years from the date of the first investment in the fund.

Are there any exceptions to being classified as an AIF and having to register with the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority?

Under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), certain entities and arrangements are excluded from being classified as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). These exceptions are designed to carve out specific types of investment vehicles or arrangements that do not fit the typical profile of an AIF. Some of the key exceptions include:

1. Holding Companies: Entities whose primary purpose is to hold shares in subsidiary companies for the purpose of managing and financing those subsidiaries are generally not considered AIFs.
2. Family Offices: Investment vehicles that manage the wealth of a single family are typically excluded, as they do not raise capital from a number of investors.
3. Employee Participation Schemes: Schemes or arrangements that involve employee participation in the capital of their employer are not considered AIFs.
4. Pension Funds: Institutions for occupational retirement provision, which are subject to specific EU regulations, are excluded from the AIF definition.
5. Supranational Institutions: Entities such as the European Central Bank, the European Investment Bank, and other similar supranational institutions are not considered AIFs.
6. National Central Banks: These are excluded from the definition of AIFs.
7. Securitization Special Purpose Entities: Entities that are set up for the purpose of securitization are generally not considered AIFs.
8. Insurance Contracts: Insurance contracts and the entities managing them are not classified as AIFs.

These exceptions are intended to ensure that the AIFMD focuses on regulating entities that genuinely operate as collective investment vehicles raising capital from multiple investors, rather than capturing entities that serve different purposes or are already subject to other regulatory frameworks.

Are investment companies AIFs?

This is a highly debated topic in Sweden and the occurrence of “investment companies”, i.e. companies that are capitalized by external investors seeking to invest in other companies is very common in Sweden. Some are small holding vehicles designed to facilitate collective investments from a few friends or family members while others are large and have portfolios worth billions. A definition of investment companies may also be include certain real-estate companies and similar. From the regulators standpoint these companies “could” be an AIF warranting registration of the manager or full authorization, depending on AUM and leverage. “Could” is obviously not a favoured term under these circumstances and it is important to note that absent being able to utilize an exception to the definition of an AIF, the company may very well be an unregistered AIF. This holds true even if there is no clear investment policy or the shareholders can elect members to the board (common misconceptions).

There are, however, many reasons why managers and investment companies should be optimistic about registration as it not only clarifies certain tax questions (VAT) but also provides for a clear regulatory framework, something your investors appreciate. The cost for registration is also minimal so the drawback is more one of administrative burden and compliance risk. If you are concerned your investment platform may be an AIF don’t hesitate to reach out to check with counsel as new legislation being rolled out in 2025 may make you a criminal for failing to register or seek authorization.

Read more here